Exploitee.rs

Posted: **Sun Oct 09, 2011 11:26 am**

Didn't work

doesnt get root privileges.. i think you should comile gingerbreak

Posted: **Sun Oct 09, 2011 12:01 pm**

Rage was a Froyo exploit. And a patched exploit for that matter within newer froyo builds. I am also highly doubting a GB exploit will work on HC.

Posted: **Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:07 pm**

Well.. I have read that Honeycomb has been rooted with Gingerbreak, that's why.

Posted: **Sun Oct 09, 2011 1:25 pm**

Its not going to work. We have root with the user debug. The system and kernal are signed and incorporated to the intels security. That's what needs breaking. Which isn't impossible. But more advanced than most of us on this forum....aside from zenofex and other gtvhacker team.

However, I do applaude your efforts. Atleast we are still trying.

Posted: **Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:05 am**

havikx wrote:Its not going to work. We have root with the user debug. The system and kernal are signed and incorporated to the intels security. That's what needs breaking. Which isn't impossible. But more advanced than most of us on this forum....aside from zenofex and other gtvhacker team.

However, I do applaude your efforts. Atleast we are still trying.

What makes you say you have root with the user debug?

Posted: **Mon Oct 10, 2011 6:34 am**

What do you mean with signed system?
Will the box stop booting after modifying file at the system-partition like android-system-apps?

A signed kernel wouldn't stop us from rooting(if we will find an working exploit).
The Motorola-Smartphones have signed kernels but thanks to 2nd-init we can boot own system-images(not kernels).

Posted: **Mon Oct 10, 2011 3:05 pm**

The user debug has adb root. Look at the first post of the first page of the debug release.

And...as I said before, breaking security is way past most of us on this board. As well as trying to make a 2nd init script for the logitech revue. 2nd init is a logical way around... but really, what are we trying to accomplish? I can't honestly see cm7 on the revue. It would add functionality to more apps...but would kill anything relating to tv. Overclock? That's all I can really see happening. And a hulu fix.

I'm sure after the official release, we will see a lot more worth while apps. And we will be happier than we are currently.

Posted: **Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:09 am**

I've read the posts, and know that the user debug has both adb and su - neither of which had write access to the system.

Having adb doesn't mean you have root.
Having write access to the root system means you have root.
All Android phones have adb, ergo all Android phones have root? I don't think so...

Has anyone been able to write to /system?

Posted: **Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:28 am**

danger-rat wrote:I've read the posts, and know that the user debug has both adb and su - neither of which had write access to the system.

Having adb doesn't mean you have root.
Having write access to the root system means you have root.
All Android phones have adb, ergo all Android phones have root? I don't think so...

Has anyone been able to write to /system?

No. We have r/w access to most the other partitions including /data. But the /SYSTEM IS SIGNED.

Again...software root but still unable to write anything we actually want to mess with.

But definately just keep asking if any1 has been able to. Its really helping us out.

Btw... I'm pretty sure "#" in adb means its root....right?....

Posted: **Tue Oct 11, 2011 7:40 am**

havikx wrote:Btw... I'm pretty sure "#" in adb means its root....right?....

Normally yes.

And: I'm not able to compile Gingerbreak. There are a lot of errors.

Code: Select all

make: Entering directory `/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86'
target  C: init <= system/core/init/init.c
system/core/init/init.c: In function 'find_got':
system/core/init/init.c:154: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
system/core/init/init.c:165: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
system/core/init/init.c:172: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
system/core/init/init.c:175: warning: comparison between signed and unsigned integer expressions
target StaticExecutable: init (out/target/product/eeepc/obj/EXECUTABLES/init_intermediates/LINKED/init)
out/target/product/eeepc/obj/EXECUTABLES/init_intermediates/init.o: In function `find_symbol':
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:127: undefined reference to `dlopen'
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:131: undefined reference to `dlsym'
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:133: undefined reference to `dlclose'
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:127: undefined reference to `dlopen'
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:131: undefined reference to `dlsym'
/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86/system/core/init/init.c:133: undefined reference to `dlclose'
collect2: ld returned 1 exit status
make: *** [out/target/product/eeepc/obj/EXECUTABLES/init_intermediates/LINKED/init] Error 1
make: Leaving directory `/home/m1cha/projects/android-x86'

Exploitee.rs

Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?

Re: Anyone tried Gingerbreak?